Wellbore Genius
Help
Model editor

Fann lab

Type the rotor speeds and dial deflections your crew measured. Both laws are regressed from every reading — τ = τ₀ + K·γ̇ⁿ for Herschel–Bulkley, τ = K·γ̇ⁿ for Power-law — then load the better fit into the model editor.

Instrument & readings
6 readings fitted
regression
Rotor speed (rpm)Dial / torque (°)γ̇ (1/s)τ measuredHB residualPL residual
1,021.451.25-0.048.91
510.732.03-0.360.22
340.524.77-0.33-2.14
170.216.55-0.21-3.67
10.26.410.480.07
5.15.13-0.190.37
Flow curve — measured vs fitted

Shear stress against shear rate (log scale). Dots are your readings.

Fit comparison

Herschel–Bulkley fits better (ΔR² 0.0639); the τ₀ = 4.40 lbf/100ft² yield stress is real.

MetricHerschel–BulkleyPower-law
Flow behaviour index n0.74430.4126
Consistency K [lbf·sⁿ/100ft²]0.27012.4286
Yield stress τ₀ [lbf/100ft²]4.40210
0.99960.9358
RMSE [lbf/100ft²]0.30264.0324
Max residual [lbf/100ft²]0.48228.9059

Recommended: Herschel–Bulkley

PV 17.7 cP · YP 12.6 lbf/100ft²

γ̇ window 5.11,021 1/s

Lab history — sweeps, fits and KPIsFit comparison — lab curve vs advisor, R² & residualsLab budget — cost per sweep & per-job pumping cost

Pushes the fit through a real well's tubular tally at every stage depth and shows the per-stage ECD, surface budget and closure drift against the advisor.

Runs the advisor on this curve across every stored well and returns the lowest feasible mud weight with the highest feasible pump rate at that weight.

The well's profile solver then runs on these readings — PV/YP come from the fitted curve and the column closure switches to the fitted law.