Reservoir risk dashboard
Cumulative injected mass, pressure rise and fault response for one injection site, each judged against its own limit. The score never reads calmer than its worst row.
Related: storage assurance, induced seismicity, microseismic catalog, and the scenario risk dashboard to score several injection plans of this site side by side.
How much CO₂ went in, and how much room is left for it.
Pressure rise against the fracture ceiling and the caprock seal.
What the pressure rise does to the mapped fault.
- Cumulative mass
- 19.72 Mt
- Pressure rise
- 52 psi
- Pressure at end
- 3,552 psi
- Slip margin left
- 639 psi
2 metrics at or near their limits
- Largest magnitude the volume allows: 5.71 Mw against a limit of 3.00 Mw
- Pore volume filled: 65 % of storable against a limit of 70 % of storable
19,723,500 t injected against 30,306,649 t of accessible pore space
Nordbotten-Celia similarity solution at end of injection
Δp 52 psi inside a 1,700 psi window to fracture pressure
Buoyancy + Δp load 86 psi against 900 psi entry pressure (seal ok)
Effective normal stress falls to 3,148 psi under Δp; strength 2,039 psi vs shear 1,400 psi
McGarr volumetric UPPER BOUND (ΣM₀ ≤ 2GΔV) — a ceiling, not a forecast
- Constant injection rate for the whole duration — no ramp-up, no shut-ins.
- Single-compartment, radially symmetric plume (Nordbotten-Celia geometry).
- Δp is the Theis log-time approximation at the wellbore, not a simulated field.
- The magnitude row is the McGarr volumetric ceiling, not a seismicity forecast.
- Net pay 61 m used for buoyancy head across the plume.