DFIT / mini-frac compilation

18 published falloff cases with picked ISIP, closure pressure, pore pressure, and permeability. Use to validate the in-app DFIT pick + permeability inversion.

Aggregate metrics

This dataset is published as inputs + assumptions evidence; no scored solver adapter is wired yet, so observed vs modeled metrics are not available. Inputs carry no depth, stress gradient, falloff record or closure time, so ISIP, closure, pore pressure and permeability cannot be predicted from them. Measured falloffs computed by the DFIT analysis are on DFIT — measured public falloffs.

Benchmark inputs (per case)

Case	Input	Value
d01	rateBpm	8
d01	volumeBbl	95
d01	viscosityCp	1
d01	payHeightFt	110
d01	rwIn	4.25
d01	reservoirTempF	235
d02	rateBpm	8
d02	volumeBbl	110
d02	viscosityCp	1
d02	payHeightFt	95
d02	rwIn	4.25
d02	reservoirTempF	250
d03	rateBpm	6
d03	volumeBbl	80
d03	viscosityCp	1.2
d03	payHeightFt	130
d03	rwIn	4.5
d03	reservoirTempF	210
d04	rateBpm	10
d04	volumeBbl	130
d04	viscosityCp	1
d04	payHeightFt	85
d04	rwIn	4.25
d04	reservoirTempF	265
d05	rateBpm	7
d05	volumeBbl	90
d05	viscosityCp	1.1
d05	payHeightFt	115
d05	rwIn	4.5
d05	reservoirTempF	225
d06	rateBpm	9
d06	volumeBbl	120
d06	viscosityCp	1
d06	payHeightFt	100
d06	rwIn	4.25
d06	reservoirTempF	255
d07	rateBpm	6
d07	volumeBbl	85
d07	viscosityCp	1.2
d07	payHeightFt	125
d07	rwIn	4.5
d07	reservoirTempF	215
d08	rateBpm	10
d08	volumeBbl	125
d08	viscosityCp	1
d08	payHeightFt	90
d08	rwIn	4.25
d08	reservoirTempF	260
d09	rateBpm	7
d09	volumeBbl	95
d09	viscosityCp	1.1
d09	payHeightFt	110
d09	rwIn	4.5
d09	reservoirTempF	230
d10	rateBpm	9
d10	volumeBbl	115
d10	viscosityCp	1
d10	payHeightFt	95
d10	rwIn	4.25
d10	reservoirTempF	250
d11	rateBpm	6
d11	volumeBbl	75
d11	viscosityCp	1.2
d11	payHeightFt	135
d11	rwIn	4.5
d11	reservoirTempF	205
d12	rateBpm	10
d12	volumeBbl	135
d12	viscosityCp	1
d12	payHeightFt	80
d12	rwIn	4.25
d12	reservoirTempF	270
d13	rateBpm	7
d13	volumeBbl	90
d13	viscosityCp	1.1
d13	payHeightFt	115
d13	rwIn	4.5
d13	reservoirTempF	220
d14	rateBpm	9
d14	volumeBbl	120
d14	viscosityCp	1
d14	payHeightFt	100
d14	rwIn	4.25
d14	reservoirTempF	255
d15	rateBpm	6
d15	volumeBbl	85
d15	viscosityCp	1.2
d15	payHeightFt	120
d15	rwIn	4.5
d15	reservoirTempF	215
d16	rateBpm	8
d16	volumeBbl	105
d16	viscosityCp	1
d16	payHeightFt	105
d16	rwIn	4.25
d16	reservoirTempF	240
d17	rateBpm	9
d17	volumeBbl	125
d17	viscosityCp	1
d17	payHeightFt	95
d17	rwIn	4.25
d17	reservoirTempF	260
d18	rateBpm	7
d18	volumeBbl	88
d18	viscosityCp	1.1
d18	payHeightFt	112
d18	rwIn	4.5
d18	reservoirTempF	225

Modeling assumptions

Not scored: the case inputs carry no depth, stress gradient, falloff record or closure time, so ISIP, closure, pore pressure and permeability cannot be predicted from them.

Assumed

No model is run; every modeled value stays empty rather than guessed.

Out of scope

Any ISIP, closure, pore-pressure or permeability prediction from these inputs
Grading — the 18 cases are classified synthetic, unverified

Scoring breakdown

Grade bands (worst-metric rollup)

A · MAPE ≤ 10%

B · MAPE ≤ 20%

C · MAPE ≤ 35%

D · MAPE > 35%

Metric	MAPE	Grade	Drives rollup?

No scored solver adapter is wired for this dataset yet — bands shown for reference.

Citations

Craig, D. P., Barree, R. D., Warpinski, N. R. & Blasingame, T. A. (2017). Fracture Closure Stress: Reexamining Field and Laboratory Experiments of Fracture Closure Using Modern Interpretation Methodologies. SPE-187038-MS.

DOI / ref: 10.2118/187038-MS

McClure, M. W., Jung, H., Cramer, D. D. & Sharma, M. M. (2016). The Fracture-Compliance Method for Picking Closure Pressure From Diagnostic Fracture-Injection Tests. SPE Journal, SPE-179725-PA.

DOI / ref: 10.2118/179725-PA

Aggregate published values reproduced for benchmark use under fair-use academic citation. No proprietary raw pressure data.

Compiled: 2026-06-29